AF Chamberlain’s field notes of Chinuk Wawa from SE British Columbia (part 15) = last installment

by

New discoveries!

I need to go find this in Rome…!

by

A unique couple of items in “Chinook Writing” are spoken of in Kamloops Wawa #158 (November 1897), page 166:

Chinook Jargon does have gender (just not female/male, and only in verb phrases)

by

My current reading of B. Jagersma’s astonishingly fine grammar of the first known written human language, Sumerian, reminds me to dash off a technical point that I ought to be emphasizing, because everyone… Continue reading

1899, WA: Canoes article, with loan words and much more

by

A person we’ve previously found talking Northern Chinook Jargon makes a further show of expertise.

More humor in Chinuk Wawa: Southern interior BC — An “old bachelor” cooks for company

by

So, in early frontier days, these 3 ladies and an “old bachelor” meet up…

1855, WA Territory: More Indian Murders — Prospects of a General War

by

North-central Washington Territory in 1855 was a dangerous place to be a miner.

Chinuk Wawa’s genderless “yaka” is due to Salish Indigenous influence

by

The more you research & think deeply into a subject, the more insights you may have.

Taking liwan ‘rib(s)’ earlier

by

We know a word for ‘rib(s)’ in Chinook Jargon; now we can say more about it.

1858, BC: “Frazer River Indians” ≠ “Chenook Indians”!

by

Very early in the Fraser, a.k.a. Fraser River gold rush, we have this evidence of 2 big points.

1915: One finds it funny to call them Savages

by

A bit of humor in objecting to Indigenous people being called bad names…